Base-Zero	Tsv-01         Tsv-02         Tsv-03         Tsv-04         Tsv-05         Tsv-06         Tsv-07         Tsv-08	Tsv-09
Contents	Lpnet1     Lpnet2     Lpnet3     Sci-shorts-01     Sci-shorts-02     Sci-shorts-03     Sci-shorts-04    Gallery	Animation
Tsv-06-100 Empire America Chapter 1: Chapter 2: Chapter 3: Chapter 4: Chapter 5:	Empire America Chapter Three The problem the ASI and Madkro had with the 9/11 ‘attack’ was the same problem the Taliban had with it in Afghanistan, in defending Osama Bin Laden. The US Bush administration refused to submit any real ’evidence’, undisputable proof, that Bin Laden and Al Qaeda were responsible. After all, if no ‘proof’ were given, then how could anyone know just exactly who was responsible?   In other words, without absolute proof, wasn’t it just as possible that some one else, such as the CIA, was responsible? Yes, it was possible, and that was why the ASI had the whole matter under secret investigation.   Bush and his republican ‘good ole boys’ wanted everyone to believe them, without a doubt, and they wanted everyone to believe that they, themselves, could never do any wrong. But the ASI knew better. The ASI said, “Do you honestly think you can fool everyone with those fake smiles and that deceptive charm?”   Not this time you can’t.   Madkro recalled a file recorded by Netikon in which he personally admitted his suspicion.   “One thing the President said,” Netikon recorded, “struck me as oddly suspect. President Bush said to all the nations of the world, ‘You’re either with us, or you’re against us.’ This was either a poor choice of words or a dead give-away that the Bush administration is determined to ‘dominate’ the planet with its ‘new world order’ whether we like it or not. For you must understand, that it has always been the sovereign choice of a nation to choose between taking sides or complete neutrality. Bush’s words appear to take away a nation’s choice to stay neutral, and that is very bad politics, war or not.”   Netikon was right. Nations should never be forced to take sides without the ability to choose neutrality. What of Switzerland, which has always been a neutral nation, throughout the 20th century, during every war? Would it also be forced to take sides? What of Tibet, home of the Dalai Lama? It has never taken sides, for religious, moral, conscientious reasons.   Then there were the CIA files. According to those, the CIA had the technology to control a passenger-jet by remote and crash it anywhere it wanted. The technology simply worked with the autopilot navigation through the onboard computer.   A lack of evidence appeared to be made up by a few pieces of evidence to support the official story, evidence which could have been easily engineered and planted by the CIA, to make an otherwise unsolvable cold mystery look like it was an open and shut case.   The whole situation was analogous with the case of the ‘obvious suspect’ of a murder being a man who publicly threatened the victim the day before. As we all know well, however, the actual murderer turned out to be another man who ‘witnessed’ the threat and decided to take advantage of it to ‘kill two birds with one stone.’ In other words, because the whole world knew that Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda wanted vengeance on the USA, they were the most obvious suspects to blame for the 9/11 ‘attacks’. But if we check the analogy, we can see that it is just as possible that the CIA and the Bush administration staged the attacks themselves just so they could blame it on Bin laden and the Al Qaeda, and thereafter, get them out of the way, in the name of ‘justice’.   In the WTC bombings, the scale of destruction was so great that neither any of the crew, passengers, or hijacker’s bodies were recovered.  Everything was reduced to ashes, including the ‘black-box’ recorders. Absolutely no evidence whatsoever about exactly who was responsible remained. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Despite this fact, the CIA and NSA were quick to place the blame, as if they were afraid putting it off would lead the FBI to them.   Then there were the airport security terminal video-records. The problem with these video-records was obvious. Not only could the records have been taken from any gate at anytime, they were also in such poor perspective that the men they fingered as terrorists could have been anyone; any number of dark-haired middle-eastern or Hispanic males could have fit the faces.   When it came down to cold, absolute reality, such evidence as was presented against Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda would not have held up in a democratic court of law. When it came right down to it, blame for the WTC 9/11 disaster was based upon circumstantial evidence which fit the general parameters of the Al Qaeda, without any real definitive proof.. As such, Netikon and the ASI had to consider the possibility that another group of people could have done it, knowing all too well that the Al Qaeda could be used as scapegoats. [Back]     [Next]